Josh Laureano

[kendallbench07]

I know i posted one about him before, but i just want to know if he is well known yet, because i can guarantee this, if you haven't heard of him when he comes to your school you will

[Section5sportsguy]

He is the most fun player to watch in the GR in my opinion. His dad is funny

[kendallbench07]

yeah i know that i started on the JV team with him last year and it was the most fun i have ever had on any team throughout my high school career, he really makes the hole team better

[TurnTwo]

If he was on a Notre Dame or an Oakfield caliber team he'd be a unanimous all-league selection in my mind.

[kendallbench07]

o for sure, he def. does not get the recognition he deserves because of how poorly the team is doing this year, but next year i really believe he will get the recognition because the team that will be kendall varsity next year was the jv team last year that went 16-2 and one of the losses was played with only 2 starters....

[TopShelf]

JV to Varsity doesn't compare. Many of the star players locally don't play any JV, except maybe 8th grade.

[boobiemiles]

JV to Varsity doesn't compare. Many of the star players locally don't play any JV, except maybe 8th grade.
thats just wolfley... Gerber played JV in 9th and 10th Grade, Seward and Riner played in 8th and 9th grade, so did james and casey call.

a lot of good players will play two years of JV. this year oakfield has 3 guys that could be playing varsity but decided to play jv as 10th graders. a lo

[Section5sportsguy]

thats just wolfley... Gerber played JV in 9th and 10th Grade, Seward and Riner played in 8th and 9th grade, so did james and casey call.

a lot of good players will play two years of JV. this year oakfield has 3 guys that could be playing varsity but decided to play jv as 10th graders. a lo

The aforementioned players aren't really stars, just solid, good players.

[boobiemiles]

The aforementioned players aren't really stars, just solid, good players.
however as jeremy said "many star players locally" there's not a lot of star players if none of them are stars. if only wolf is a "star player" then locally there are not very many. but pysher said "many star players locally", indicating that there are many stars locally. many meaning a lot. so if you were to take the best one or two players from all the top teams, you would get many local stars, which is what he is referring to when talking about laureno. if laureno is not a star then pyshers comment has no bearing on the conversation. i doubt that jeremy would make a comment with little or no relevance, so that would make laureno a star. if laureno is a star then you would have to believe that there are many local stars, as he indicated. local stars could include: bender, partridge, flannery, wolfley, davis, seward, boccichio, francis, wright, laureno, a williams, babcock, woodworth, hoover, zambito, etc. all stars by pyshers regard. therefore i was giving examples of players on oakfield, whose JV history i personally know. any of the players can be considered stars at certain times so that's why i mentioned them.

[kendallbench07]

I know that i sound bias and you think i may be saying this because i come from kendall by i truly believe that josh is above most of those players, with exceptions to obviously wolfley and davis...which i haven't seen play but have only heard good things about, woodworth, and zambitio(the kids lights out man).

[hilly]

however as jeremy said "many star players locally" there's not a lot of star players if none of them are stars. if only wolf is a "star player" then locally there are not very many. but pysher said "many star players locally", indicating that there are many stars locally. many meaning a lot. so if you were to take the best one or two players from all the top teams, you would get many local stars, which is what he is referring to when talking about laureno. if laureno is not a star then pyshers comment has no bearing on the conversation. i doubt that jeremy would make a comment with little or no relevance, so that would make laureno a star. if laureno is at star then you would have to believe that there are many local stars, as he indicated. local stars could include: bender, partridge, flannery, wolfley, davis, seward, boccichio, francis, wright, laureno, a williams, babcock, woodworth, hoover, zambito, etc. all stars by pyshers regard. therefore i was giving examples of players on oakfield, whose JV history i personally know. any of the players can be considered stars at certain times so that's why i mentioned them.



reading this made my head hurt

[kendallbench07]

reading this made my head hurt

Ha i have to agree

[boobiemiles]

reading this made my head hurt
haha. you have to admit it was good though. one of my better rants

[boobiemiles]

I know that i sound bias and you think i may be saying this because i come from kendall by i truly believe that josh is above most of those players, with exceptions to obviously wolfley and davis...which i haven't seen play but have only heard good things about, woodworth, and zambitio(the kids lights out man).
i agree that he is a top tier player, i would clearly put him in the top 10 for gr