PDA

View Full Version : Class C


Blackburn11
09-21-2007, 02:57 PM
Who is the best team in all of Class C?

UNCTarheels
09-21-2007, 03:29 PM
That's a tough question, there's alot of good teams

Cal-Mum
Red Creek
Wheatland-Chili
Keshequa
East-Rochester

they're all good teams It's a toss up

AllDayEveryDay
10-04-2007, 01:31 PM
That's a tough question, there's alot of good teams

Cal-Mum
Red Creek
Wheatland-Chili
Keshequa
East-Rochester

they're all good teams It's a toss up

East Rochester is a very talented squad. Cal-Mum has not played anyone yet, once they play a team like ER or Red Creek they will faulter

Blackburn11
10-04-2007, 02:35 PM
I've only seen ER play once and that was against Red Creek on their home turf. They have skill all throughout the team. They have two really talented forwards and in that game there goalie came up with a ton of big saves. From what i've seen they look like the team to beat in Class CC

ERHS07
10-04-2007, 10:18 PM
Agreed... I may be biased, but ER is the team to beat in my book. Anthony Danizio is incredibly talented - super fast and amazing footwork. But he's not their only talent - they are a solid team all over the field, including goal. Can't wait to see how they do the rest of the season.

DrewVT6
10-24-2007, 03:11 PM
Was the Geneseo/Lyndonville sectional game postponed last night? I don't see any score for it anywhere. Anyone have a replay time/date? I assume tonight, but what time?

whistleblower
10-29-2007, 02:52 PM
Anyone agree Red Creek will expose the Cal-Mum schedule?

UNCTarheels
10-29-2007, 02:54 PM
Cal-Mum will have it's hands full with Red Creek

Blackburn11
10-29-2007, 10:29 PM
Most likely, but this is sectionals so anything can happen. Er could lose to Bk who they have beaten twice 7-0 and 2-0. That is the beauty of sectionals, it really is anyones to win.

CARL
10-30-2007, 08:03 PM
Wheatland falls to Pavilion?!? This is a huge upset! Did anybody see the game?

Blackburn11
10-30-2007, 08:50 PM
Pavillion was outshot 27-3 in the game. Both the number 1 and 2 seeds in Class C are out now. Should be an interesting final.

ERHS07
10-30-2007, 09:37 PM
Who won the Red Creek/ Cal-Mum game?

Blackburn11
10-30-2007, 11:04 PM
Red Creek dominated with a 5-0 victory over Cal-mum, another RC ER matchup. Should be fun to watch.

DrewVT6
10-31-2007, 11:50 AM
Where/When is the final? I think people picked ER to be there from the start.

ERHS07
11-01-2007, 09:02 AM
I thought the final between ER and Red Creek was at Paetec Park, but the section V soccer website says Livonia? Anyone know what's going on with that?

Jammer24
11-01-2007, 09:43 AM
is a crappy place to watch a soccer game, I know that.

Blackburn11
11-01-2007, 10:09 AM
If the game is at Livonia thats a shame, its amazing to think they couldn't find a better field to play the finals at.

DrewVT6
11-01-2007, 07:25 PM
is a crappy place to watch a soccer game, I know that.

I actually kinda like Livonia's setup. Although HFL's stadium is much nicer, and if you're going to be in the neighborhood you might as well stop at the nicest house.

dfisch80
11-02-2007, 05:47 AM
Good Luck to ER tomorrow!!...Bring it home guys!!

lcaabasketball
11-02-2007, 11:43 AM
The game is at Livonia because #1 section v wants both C finals games at the same site. #2 paetec has football finals all day and night. I thought they would play somewhere better than Livonia..but it's still gonna be a great game. I watched Red Creek beat Letchworth and Cal-Mum in very convincing fashion. ER beat RC twice already this year...it will be tough to do it 3 times.

Jammer24
11-02-2007, 01:48 PM
is at full strength this time.

ERHS07
11-02-2007, 03:02 PM
is at full strength this time.

I believe Red Creek was at full strength the 2nd time these two teams met, too.

No matter what, this is going to be a great game!

Blackburn11
11-03-2007, 07:42 PM
Red Creek won easily with a score of 3-0. It was a pretty even first half with a few good saves by each team and that ended 0-0. Second half was a different story though, Red Creek won every 50 50 and the ball must have been on ER's side 70% of the time. The ER keeper had a few really good saves but the two shots were ripped in from about 10 yards out each time to make the score 2-0. After a hard foul with 6 seconds left Red Creek's mvp had an incredible free kick that went sailing the the left upper 90. All in all Red Creek outplayed ER in this game and deserved to win. Good luck rest of the way RC

mulesasbestmascot
11-04-2007, 10:48 AM
good write up, blackburn...Anthony Roden of Red Creek is finally starting to get used to having a healthy ankle. he missed the first 5 weeks or so of the season, and the 2nd game against ER was his first game back...he is the one that was dominating the 50-50 balls (and did an undercut front flip) and assisted Ryan Fisher's first two goals.

any predictions on RC vs. Pavilion?

Blackburn11
11-04-2007, 05:08 PM
If RC plays the way they did against ER then they should win another state title. Its a shame they seem to always meet in the sectional finals, i feel ER would have faced Red Creek in state finals both this year and two years ago if they didnt have to play till the end of the season.

ERHS07
11-04-2007, 05:50 PM
First, I hope they never have the finals at Livonia again - amazing that they couldn't find a venue capable of holding a lot of spectators!

This was a sad game. A couple of the ER guys played as well as or better than I have ever seen them play before - Anthony Danizio, Ben Bouchard, Dan Parshal, Andrew Hampson, Andrew Belt, Eric Reynolds, James Shaw - and probably a few I am forgetting - they gave it everything they had and there's no shame in that. Red Creek had 3 guys on Danizio the entire game, but he still smoked them all down the field. Don't get me wrong - RC played a hell of a game and they definitely earned that win - but I was proud of ER for not giving up.

Great season, ER!

RC4lyfe
11-05-2007, 09:25 PM
What game were you watching? There was no doubt in my mind that ER is a good club gave it there all, however if anything it was one of Danizio's more mediocre performances. Give the kid some credit. He is a great player and deserves the recognition, but as for smoking the red creek defense while being defended by three at a time, that was something that I deffinatly did not see that game. How many goals did he score again? Any assists? Final score 3-0 Red Creek incase u missed that one. Most likely due to the finely tuned soccer machine that Red Creek has mustered up for sectionals and now state play, which is a place where ER finds difficulty reaching while facing Red Creek in sectional play. Once again ER is a good club but no match for a healthy Red Creek squad.

Blackburn11
11-05-2007, 10:28 PM
Well i feel that is a very biased interpretation of that game. Simply put Red Creek wanted that game more, and they played better because of it. Watching ER play was not how they have played in the past, they just didnt seem ready for it. Granted Red Creek is a great team with alot of talented players but to say that ER is no match for them is an untrue statement. They are two talented squards and at this match-up Red Creek got the best of them.

ERHS07
11-06-2007, 07:06 AM
Granted Red Creek is a great team with alot of talented players but to say that ER is no match for them is an untrue statement. They are two talented squards and at this match-up Red Creek got the best of them.


Thank you - this is exactly what I was saying. As I said, Red Creek earned the win. No need for RC4lyfe to completely insult ER when I was simply stating my opinion and congratulating them on their performance.

mulesasbestmascot
11-06-2007, 06:30 PM
I don't think that RC4lyfe's statement about "ER no match for healthy RC" is untrue. The facts support his statement. The only meeting between this year's healthy RC and ER clubs produced a 3-0 RC victory.

In all three meetings between the two clubs, the best player on the field dominated. In the first two games with RC's battered squad, that player was ER's Anthony Danizio, and ER won both games. However, on Saturday, the best player was RC's Anthony Roden, finally at full strength, and RC won handily.

ER definitely did not look as they did in the past, but I don’t think it’s because they played worse, as Blackburn claims. After all, ERHS07 clearly states that “Anthony Danizio, Ben Bouchard, Dan Parshal, Andrew Hampson, Andrew Belt, Eric Reynolds, James Shaw - and probably a few I am forgetting…played as well as or better than I have ever seen them play before.” That’s at least 7 of 11 players, including possible PoY Danizio and goalie Bouchard! They played better than ever before, but still lost? What’s different in this game then? The only logical answer is a healthy RC squad. The proof is all there. RC4lyfe is right; ER was no match for RC. No “insult” there. Simply fact.

Blackburn11
11-06-2007, 10:14 PM
Either way Red Creek won the game and is moving on. And good luck to them. It had been a great season for both teams and hopefully this rivalry will continue to thrive.

ERHS07
11-07-2007, 07:09 AM
So you're saying that the only reason RC lost the first two match ups was because Roden was hurt? It'll be fun to see what happens to RC when he graduates then.

mulesasbestmascot
11-07-2007, 10:50 AM
So you're saying that the only reason RC lost the first two match ups was because Roden was hurt? It'll be fun to see what happens to RC when he graduates then.

Correct. That's exactly what I'm saying. A healthy RC with a healthy Roden is better than a healthy ER.

As for next year, we have a very deep soccer program (as evidenced by Red Creek's 4 sectional titles in the past five years). After last year's graduation of two All-State players (Kyle Salo and Mark McIntyre), we still managed to scrape by this year to yet again win the sectional title. We have survived graduating classes before, and I'm sure we'll survive this one.
So, in conclusion, you were once again correct; it will be fun to see what happens when Anthony Roden graduates.

And what about ER's graduating class this year? Big? Small? Replaceable?

P.S.--Next time, use some tact with that sarcasm

Soccerfollower
11-07-2007, 02:45 PM
as i see it, ER had only three kids that could actually find the net consistently, but RC had 5 or 6. so when there is a healthy RC team, it only makes sense to see a team with more 20 more goals in one season to win.

just look at the stats.


simply put.

Blackburn11
11-07-2007, 03:31 PM
But they also allowed 15 more goals than ER did. However Red Creeks last 8 games have been amazing outscoring their opponents 38-15. No matter what that is impressive. And also its soccer, last year Red Creek lost to WC and they were definitly the better team in my eyes. Its a silly game, and every little second counts. If ER had gotten a goal on there one opurtunity in the first half it would have been a different story, but they didnt and thats how it ended. ER's probaly was that they relied to much on Danizo, if the ball didnt work through him than not much happened, with three guys on him like RC did in the finals it worked.

RCfan32
11-08-2007, 08:40 AM
Last night the RC varsity boys absolutely dominated the Pavilion Golden Gophers 5-0. Soph. Eli Vitale 2 goals, Sr. Anthony Roden 1 goal, Jr. Ryan Fisher 1 goal, Soph. Ryon Adam 1 goal Pavilion had 5 shots on goal all game. Anyone to criticize them on this victory????

RCfan32
11-08-2007, 08:41 AM
Oh, and not to mention in Sectional play Red Creek has out scored their opponents 18-2, which in my eyes is pretty amazing

ERHS07
11-08-2007, 09:01 AM
Umm... calm down there, sparky, I'm pretty sure no one criticized them on any of their victories. We all know they are a talented squad.

mulesasbestmascot
11-08-2007, 01:14 PM
He's just asking...besides criticizing can be good or bad...constructional criticism is very positive, and RC definitely did not play their 'A' game last night, so plenty of room for constructional criticism is possible.

You sure are defensive, ERHS07. What's wrong...3-0 scoreboard still burned into your retinas?

Blackburn11
11-08-2007, 01:18 PM
It was a pretty well known fact that whoever won Class CC would go onto regionals. Score was what i expected, easily won game.

ERHS07
11-08-2007, 01:53 PM
You sure are defensive, ERHS07. What's wrong...3-0 scoreboard still burned into your retinas?

I'm really not being defensive. I have said repeatedly that Red Creek earned their victory over ER. Other than saying Anthony Danizio played well even with 3 guys on him (which is my opinion) I haven't said much about the game at all, and I most definitely haven't said anything bad about it. I just said it was a sad game - which it was, in my opinion. Please don't misconstrue my tone as being upset or defensive, though, cause I really am not. If anything, it's the RC fans who have been all riled up about this one. ;)

mulesasbestmascot
11-08-2007, 06:56 PM
I'm really not being defensive. I have said repeatedly that Red Creek earned their victory over ER. Other than saying Anthony Danizio played well even with 3 guys on him (which is my opinion) I haven't said much about the game at all, and I most definitely haven't said anything bad about it. I just said it was a sad game - which it was, in my opinion. Please don't misconstrue my tone as being upset or defensive, though, cause I really am not. If anything, it's the RC fans who have been all riled up about this one. ;)

Not defensive, eh? So you’re pretty neutral about this whole thing then. So there’s no real reason to tell anyone to “call down there, sparky,” right? I mean, why waste your time telling him to calm down when it doesn’t bother you? You said you’re “not being defensive,” but you seem to be commenting an awful lot to RC fans celebrating wins that our team has “earned.” So…why are you commenting if not for defensive reasons?

Anthony Danizio did play well (our opinions agree), but having three guys on him is not an opinion…it’s a false fact. Like virtually every other soccer team in the world, RC plays zone-based defense. So it only makes sense that Danizio (being a hustle player, running all over the field) would be covered by different defenders at different times…whether it was fullbacks or our field-encompassing middies. He didn’t have three RC guys assigned to him while everyone else played 8 on 10.

Riled up? Right, because 3 to 0, sectional-winning, arch rival-whipping beatdowns really irritate us here in Red Creek. I think your mistaken, ERSH07; you must have “misconstrued our tones.”

ERHS07
11-08-2007, 07:05 PM
Not defensive, eh? So you’re pretty neutral about this whole thing then. So there’s no real reason to tell anyone to “call down there, sparky,” right? I mean, why waste your time telling him to calm down when it doesn’t bother you? You said you’re “not being defensive,” but you seem to be commenting an awful lot to RC fans celebrating wins that our team has “earned.” So…why are you commenting if not for defensive reasons?

Anthony Danizio did play well (our opinions agree), but having three guys on him is not an opinion…it’s a false fact. Like virtually every other soccer team in the world, RC plays zone-based defense. So it only makes sense that Danizio (being a hustle player, running all over the field) would be covered by different defenders at different times…whether it was fullbacks or our field-encompassing middies. He didn’t have three RC guys assigned to him while everyone else played 8 on 10.

Riled up? Right, because 3 to 0, sectional-winning, arch rival-whipping beatdowns really irritate us here in Red Creek. I think your mistaken, ERSH07; you must have “misconstrued our tones.”


Sigh... nothing to misconstrue about your tone there.

mulesasbestmascot
11-08-2007, 07:52 PM
Sigh... nothing to misconstrue about your tone there.

I just had an epiphany...I knew something was wrong, but I just couldn't put my finger on it. I finally understand now. I'll start by saying sorry. My concise writing tone DID leave "nothing to misconstrue." And the fact that my clarity is in such opposition to your ambiguity must have left you at a loss for words, and I apologize for that. So now I'm going to give you a little nudge, but you gotta do the rest yourself. When dealing with someone else's post, don't tiptoe around the tulips by leaving unsupported one-sentence responses; it makes you look like your intentionally avoiding the conversation. You aren't doing that, are you? Instead, respond to the main point (or thesis, if you will) of the argument. I know it must be tough, but it will make you look like you know what you're talking about. A great starting point would be defending your writing tone (as you so cleverly avoiding doing so last post) for I am still confused, and I'm sure that picket fence you've been balancing on must be ready to topple and jab you. (Imagine here an emoticon showing a guy with a fence post lodged in his butt...that's you)

mulesasbestmascot
11-08-2007, 07:57 PM
I'm going to bed...here's a little homework assignment.

Post something logical by morning.

The1andONLY51
11-08-2007, 08:42 PM
Hey guys, the game is over, has been for awhile, please move on.

Blackburn11
11-08-2007, 09:33 PM
Seriously, Red Creek won and is moving onto States (which they will probaly win). So good luck to them and good season to ER. It's over.